Is Vaping Health Risky?
The author examines the possible social and health advantages of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She refers to e-cigarettes as electronic cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the different possibilities for teens in light to the fact that smoking has turned into a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that people should think about the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also taking into consideration the dangers of nicotine addiction. The author also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I agree with her that e-cigarette vaporizers are a harmless alternative to smoking, if used correctly.
A lot of the data on smoking and its risks comes from adults, and this helps it be hard to assess the way the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It is estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths every year are due to smoking. This figure is probable an underestimation, since many deaths may be the result of second hand smoke. It also assumes that folks who smoke don’t intend to achieve this.
The author suggests that we should think about the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the effect of tobacco products, while providing a far less harmful experience. The problem with this particular approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, though it isn’t. Many people don’t understand how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking is to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that people who utilize the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that comes from this is that because e smokers don’t feel any of the physical effects of smoking, they can’t be deemed to be causing these deaths, when they are.
However, it is important to remember that smoking and using vaporizers are both virtually identical behaviors. Why is vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to get the same effect as smoking, without the associated risks. Vaporizing provides a highly similar experience as smoking cigarettes. This means that vapers may be increasing their likelihood of quitting the habit. In addition, it means that they are taking steps in the direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the opportunity of enjoying a wholesome lifestyle.
The author makes some valid points concerning the dangers of smoking. He also makes some valid criticisms of having less nicotine, and of the dangers of carbon monoxide smoke. However, his real issue is one of regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies shouldn’t be allowed to advertise their products as safe when all they have done is increase the level of chemicals and additives that are present in traditional cigarettes. The problem with this argument is that people have already seen the negative effects of increased levels of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We curently have countless reports concerning the negative unwanted effects of nicotine, especially in smokers attempting to quit. We already have plenty of stories about the rise of cancers and respiratory problems due to long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been a significant factor in the spike in smoking-related deaths JUUL Pods over the past couple of years.
The author does not appear to recognize the irony of arguing against smoking by way of a healthier alternative, but doesn’t seem to think about the potential negative health effects of his product either. He also discounts the theory that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually turn back to cigarette smoking. He seems to think that all we must do to beat cigarettes is to reduce the quantity of nicotine we take in. The truth is that smokers who make an effort to quit often do so due to other medical issues, and aren’t just turning to the cigarettes to get from their bad habits. There are lots of reasons why people smoke. The writer has basically ignored all of them in his arguments against vaping.
While it is true that the cigarettes do not contain any real tobacco, a few of the chemicals found in using tobacco are located in the smokes. The writer seems to be of the belief that all we must do to solve the problem of smoking is to decrease the amount of chemicals we ingest through our lungs. The argument he presents is merely not located in sound scientific fact. There is absolutely no real proof that reducing the volume of chemicals we take in improves anything other than our health. The author also discounts the idea that the cigarettes are less dangerous than regular cigarettes because they don’t contain the harmful chemicals within regular cigarettes.